ProZ.com translation contests »
Bon voyage: "Stories about travel" » English to Persian (Farsi)

Competition in this pair is now closed.

Discussion and feedback about the competition in this language pair may now be provided by visiting the "Discussion & feedback" page for this pair. Entries may also be individually discussed by clicking the "Discuss" link next to any listed entry.

Source text in English

The moment when, 50 years ago, Neil Armstrong planted his foot on the surface of the Moon inspired awe, pride and wonder around the world. This newspaper argued that “man, from this day on, can go wheresoever in the universe his mind wills and his ingenuity contrives…to the planets, sooner rather than later, man is now certain to go.” But no. The Moon landing was an aberration, a goal achieved not as an end in itself but as a means of signalling America’s extraordinary capabilities. That point, once made, required no remaking. Only 571 people have been into orbit; and since 1972 no one has ventured much farther into space than Des Moines is from Chicago.

The next 50 years will look very different. Falling costs, new technologies, Chinese and Indian ambitions, and a new generation of entrepreneurs promise a bold era of space development. It will almost certainly involve tourism for the rich and better communications networks for all; in the long run it might involve mineral exploitation and even mass transportation. Space will become ever more like an extension of Earth—an arena for firms and private individuals, not just governments. But for this promise to be fulfilled the world needs to create a system of laws to govern the heavens—both in peacetime and, should it come to that, in war.

The development of space thus far has been focused on facilitating activity down below—mainly satellite communications for broadcasting and navigation. Now two things are changing. First, geopolitics is stoking a new push to send humans beyond the shallows of low-Earth orbit. China plans to land people on the Moon by 2035. President Donald Trump’s administration wants Americans to be back there by 2024. Falling costs make this showing off more affordable than before. Apollo cost hundreds of billions of dollars (in today’s money). Now tens of billions are the ticket price.

[ … ]

It is a mistake to promote space as a romanticised Wild West, an anarchic frontier where humanity can throw off its fetters and rediscover its destiny. For space to fulfil its promise governance is required. At a time when the world cannot agree on rules for the terrestrial trade of steel bars and soybeans that may seem like a big ask. But without it the potential of all that lies beyond Earth will at best wait another 50 years to be fulfilled. At worst space could add to Earth’s problems.

Winning entries could not be determined in this language pair.

There were 10 entries submitted in this pair during the submission phase, 7 of which were selected by peers to advance to the finals round. Not enough votes were submitted by peers for a winning entry to be determined.

Competition in this pair is now closed.


Entries (10 total; 7 finalists) Expand all entries

Entry #28130 — Discuss 0 — Variant: Not specified
Finalist
Voting points1st2nd3rd
4610 x43 x20
Rating typeOverallQualityAccuracy
Entry4.134.13 (15 ratings)4.13 (15 ratings)
Entry tagging:
  • 1 user entered 2 "like" tags
در زمین
Good term selection
Amadre
بدون قانون
Good term selection
Amadre
Entry #28030 — Discuss 0 — Variant: Not specified
Finalist
Voting points1st2nd3rd
211 x48 x21 x1
Rating typeOverallQualityAccuracy
Entry4.004.00 (14 ratings)4.00 (14 ratings)
Entry tagging:
  • 1 user entered 1 "like" tag
رخ بکشد
Good term selection
Sanaz Khanjani
Entry #28187 — Discuss 0 — Variant: Not specified
Finalist
Voting points1st2nd3rd
153 x41 x21 x1
Rating typeOverallQualityAccuracy
Entry2.602.67 (15 ratings)2.53 (15 ratings)
Entry tagging:
  • 1 user entered 1 "like" tag
زمانی که این توانایی به همه نشان داده شد دیگر نیازی به تکرار آن نبود
Other
فهم مطلب د​رست
Amadre
Entry #28013 — Discuss 0 — Variant: Not specified
Finalist
Voting points1st2nd3rd
111 x42 x23 x1
Rating typeOverallQualityAccuracy
Entry3.493.38 (16 ratings)3.60 (15 ratings)
Entry tagging:
  • No "like" tags
Entry #27662 — Discuss 0 — Variant: Not specified
Finalist
Voting points1st2nd3rd
101 x41 x24 x1
Rating typeOverallQualityAccuracy
Entry2.973.00 (17 ratings)2.94 (17 ratings)
Entry tagging:
  • No "like" tags
Entry #27875 — Discuss 0 — Variant: Not specified
Finalist
Voting points1st2nd3rd
61 x402 x1
Rating typeOverallQualityAccuracy
Entry2.002.00 (16 ratings)2.00 (16 ratings)
Entry tagging:
  • 1 user entered 3 "like" tags
  • 1 user disagreed with "likes" (3 total disagrees)
-1
غنی
Good term selection
Milad Kakaie
-1
ارتباطات ماهواره‌ای در امواج رادیویی
Good term selection
Milad Kakaie
-1
تعهد حکومتی
Good term selection
Milad Kakaie
Entry #27736 — Discuss 0 — Variant: Not specified
Finalist
Voting points1st2nd3rd
4004 x1
Rating typeOverallQualityAccuracy
Entry3.002.75 (16 ratings)3.25 (16 ratings)
Entry tagging:
  • No "like" tags


Non-finalist entries

The following entries were not selected by peers to advance to finals-round voting.

Entry #27964 — Discuss 0 — Variant: Not specified
Rating typeOverallQualityAccuracy
Entry1.781.81 (16 ratings)1.75 (16 ratings)
Entry tagging:
  • 2 users entered 8 "like" tags
  • 1 user disagreed with "likes" (1 total disagree)
حیرت
Good term selection
Amadre
استثنا
Good term selection
Amadre
وقتی که آن مهم حاصل شد
Good term selection
Amadre
بی پروایی
Good term selection
Amadre
جنگ احتمالی
Good term selection
Amadre
اما
Flows well
Amadre
-1
خودنمایی
Good term selection
Ali Sharifi
خواسته
Good term selection
Amadre
Entry #27481 — Discuss 0 — Variant: Not specified
Rating typeOverallQualityAccuracy
Entry1.741.74 (19 ratings)1.74 (19 ratings)
Entry tagging:
  • 1 user entered 3 "like" tags
  • 1 user disagreed with "likes" (1 total disagree)
-1
به نمایش گذاشتن
Good term selection
Sanaz Khanjani
تسهیل فعالیت
Good term selection
Sanaz Khanjani
ورای زمین
Good term selection
Sanaz Khanjani
Entry #27593 — Discuss 0 — Variant: Not specified
Rating typeOverallQualityAccuracy
Entry1.401.36 (14 ratings)1.43 (14 ratings)
Entry tagging:
  • No "like" tags